Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Casio. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and EX-ZR300 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-S5 was announced 4 years before the EX-ZR300 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-S5 scores against the EX-ZR300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S5 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S5 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Casio EX-ZR300
EX-S5 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Casio EX-S5
EX-ZR300 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 41 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 115k | Crisper screen (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Casio EX-ZR300
EX-S5 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S5 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR300 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S5 vs the EX-ZR300.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and EX-ZR300 is 97 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S5 and EX-ZR300.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in extra detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older EX-S5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-05-22 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Exilim Engine HS |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 15 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $130 | $329 |