Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Casio. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and EX-ZR400 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S5 was manufactured 5 years before the EX-ZR400 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-S5 grades vs the EX-ZR400 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR400. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Casio EX-ZR400
EX-S5 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Casio EX-S5
EX-ZR400 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2009 | More recent by 49 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 115k | Clearer display (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Casio EX-ZR400
EX-S5 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S5 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR400 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-S5 versus the EX-ZR400.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and EX-ZR400 is 97 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and EX-ZR400.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to resolve extra detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-S5 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-29 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Exilim Engine HS |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 15s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 30.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 gr (0.22 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $130 | $0 |