Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR800
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-S5 and Casio EX-ZR800, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Casio. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S5 was introduced 5 years prior to the EX-ZR800 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-S5 grades versus the EX-ZR800 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR800. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Casio EX-ZR800
EX-S5 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Casio EX-S5
EX-ZR800 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 55 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 115k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Casio EX-ZR800
EX-S5 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S5 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR800 has proportions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S5 and Casio EX-ZR800 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S5 vs the EX-ZR800.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and EX-ZR800 is 97 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S5 and EX-ZR800.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer you greater detail using its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2013-08-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lb) | 222 grams (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $130 | $429 |