Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XQ2
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the EX-S5 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") have different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S5 was released 5 years earlier than the Fujifilm XQ1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-S5 scores against the Fujifilm XQ1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Fujifilm XQ1. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Fujifilm XQ1
EX-S5 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Casio EX-S5
Fujifilm XQ1 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 59 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Fujifilm XQ1
EX-S5 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S5 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Fujifilm XQ1 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-S5 against the Fujifilm XQ1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and Fujifilm XQ1 is 97 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S5 and Fujifilm XQ1.
As you can see, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-S5 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Fujifilm XQ1 will show more detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2013-11-26 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 115k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | NP-48 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $130 | $500 |