Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
![Casio Exilim EX-S5 front Casio Exilim EX-S5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5/Casio-EX-S5-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare M340 front Kodak EasyShare M340 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M340/Kodak-M340-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-S5 (9MP) and the M340 (10MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The EX-S5 was brought out very close to the M340 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-S5 grades against the M340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S5 and Kodak EasyShare M340. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S5 Gallery and Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Kodak M340
EX-S5 | M340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Casio EX-S5
M340 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Kodak M340
EX-S5 | M340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Same generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S5 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Kodak M340 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S5 compared to the M340.
![Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 size comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M340-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and M340 is 97 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M340-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The visual below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S5 and M340.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Kodak M340 to produce extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
![Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M340-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S5-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M340-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S5 vs Kodak M340 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3664 x 2748 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100g (0.22 lbs) | 115g (0.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | KLIC-7001 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $130 | $130 |