Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S5 was launched 8 years prior to the TG-870 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-S5 scores versus the TG-870 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S5 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Olympus TG-870
EX-S5 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-S5
TG-870 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | January 2009 | Newer by 85 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 115k | Sharper display (+806k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Olympus TG-870
EX-S5 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S5 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S5 against the TG-870.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and TG-870 is 97 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The pic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S5 and TG-870.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-870 to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $130 | $280 |