Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the EX-S5 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S5 was released 10 months before the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-S5 scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-S5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-S5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2009 | January 2009 | More modern by 10 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-S5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S5 has physical measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-S5 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 97 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-S5 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100 gr (0.22 lbs) | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $130 | $566 |