Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24


84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched August 2011

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the EX-S5 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

The EX-S5 was revealed 3 years earlier than the GXR Mount A12 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-S5 grades versus the GXR Mount A12 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-S5 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-S5
GXR Mount A12 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-S5 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S5 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has proportions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-S5 vs the GXR Mount A12.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and GXR Mount A12 is 97 and 84 respectively.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S5 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 will render greater detail because of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | () |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 9.60 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 gr (0.22 pounds) | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $130 | $349 |