Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-S5 (9MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is pretty similar but the EX-S5 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizing.

The EX-S5 was announced 14 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S5 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-S5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-S5
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 14 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-S5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S5 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-S5 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 97 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-S5 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will offer more detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-S5 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100 gr (0.22 pounds) | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $349 |