Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-S5 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-S5 was revealed 6 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-S5 grades versus the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-S5 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-S5
WG-4 GPS | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-S5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S5 provides physical measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S5 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S5 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and WG-4 GPS is 97 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The photograph below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve more detail because of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-S5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 115k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100g (0.22 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $130 | $210 |