Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ed5a/5ed5a1c2394c091f336717751f8785f2557c5e72" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S5 front Casio Exilim EX-S5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Renewed by Samsung GX-20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung GX-10, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-S5 (9MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-S5 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The EX-S5 was brought out 2 years after the GX-10 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-S5 grades versus the GX-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung GX-10
EX-S5 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 28 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Casio EX-S5
GX-10 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 210k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+95k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung GX-10
EX-S5 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S5 features outside measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-S5 vs the GX-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03385/0338560cac2cb1a6d545ebb1b5756db7eacc4b39" alt="Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and GX-10 is 97 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/578bc/578bc2c1cf7c297f22a5a3728f7fbcdd00803fab" alt="Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The pic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and GX-10.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-S5 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung GX-10 will resolve greater detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-S5 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2df48/2df48b86d0d1e604623d5ccc1826562bb8ce9584" alt="Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7d09/e7d090b9a91234b92b91f71fa7f95b169db03f71" alt="Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung GX-10 |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | () | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 pounds) | 793 grams (1.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $130 | $850 |