Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung HZ35W
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S5 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S5 was announced 17 months prior to the HZ35W which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-S5 scores against the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-S5 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-S5
| HZ35W | EX-S5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+499k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-S5 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S5 provides outside measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S5 versus Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S5 compared to the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and HZ35W is 97 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specifications. The picture underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung HZ35W to offer you more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 100 gr (0.22 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $130 | $300 |