Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and WB210 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S5 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the WB210 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-S5 matches up versus the WB210 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung WB210
EX-S5 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 115k | 1k | Sharper display (+114k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-S5
WB210 | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 30 months | |
Display size | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB210
EX-S5 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S5 has got external measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-S5 versus the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and WB210 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and WB210.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB210 to offer you more detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB210 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100g (0.22 lb) | 174g (0.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $130 | $279 |