Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB2200F
97 Imaging
32 Features
12 Overall
24
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-S5 versus Samsung WB2200F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S5 was announced 6 years prior to the WB2200F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-S5 matches up against the WB2200F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-S5 | WB2200F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-S5
WB2200F | EX-S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | January 2009 | Fresher by 60 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-S5 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S5 offers external measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S5 versus Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-S5 versus the WB2200F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S5 and WB2200F is 97 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The graphic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and WB2200F.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to give you extra detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-S5 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Samsung WB2200F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 1/8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100g (0.22 pounds) | 708g (1.56 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $130 | $599 |