Clicky

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
97
Imaging
32
Features
12
Overall
24
Casio Exilim EX-S5 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Casio EX-S5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-S5 (9MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-S5 was manufactured 6 years before the WB350F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-S5 matches up vs the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Samsung WB350F

 EX-S5 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-S5

 WB350F EX-S5 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2009Newer by 60 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k115kClearer screen (+345k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB350F

 EX-S5 WB350F 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S5 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S5 against the WB350F.

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S5 and WB350F is 97 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S5 and WB350F.

As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB350F to give extra detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S5 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S5 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography highlights
25
manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
40
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S5 Street photography details
Samsung WB350F Street photography details
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S5 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB350F Sports photography factors
16
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
50
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-S5
Travel photography with Samsung WB350F
53
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
69
lighter than competition (276g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S5 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography details
27
manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
50
you can focus manually
really wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S5
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
22
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
34
really wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (276 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S5 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S5 and Samsung WB350F
 Casio Exilim EX-S5Samsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-S5 Samsung WB350F
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-01-08 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8-5.9
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 115k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/2 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 100 grams (0.22 lb) 276 grams (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $130 $260