Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200
97 Imaging
31 Features
12 Overall
23
66 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Renewed by Sony A230
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-S5 (9MP) and the A200 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-S5 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S5 was brought out 6 months after the A200 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-S5 grades vs the A200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S5 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S5 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S5 over the Sony A200
| EX-S5 | A200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Casio EX-S5
| A200 | EX-S5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S5 and Sony A200
| EX-S5 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 | July 2008 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-S5 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 35mm x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) and the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S5 vs the A200.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S5 and A200 is 97 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S5 and A200.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S5 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony A200 will resolve more detail having its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S5 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2008-07-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | () | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $100 |