Casio EX-S7 vs Casio EX-ZR800
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-S7 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
Casio EX-S7 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-S7 and Casio EX-ZR800, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Casio. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the EX-S7 (12MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-S7 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the EX-ZR800 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S7 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-S7 scores versus the EX-ZR800 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S7 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S7 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR800. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-S7 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S7 over the Casio EX-ZR800
EX-S7 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Casio EX-S7
EX-ZR800 | EX-S7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | February 2010 | More modern by 42 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S7 and Casio EX-ZR800
EX-S7 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-S7 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S7 has outside measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR800 has dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S7 and Casio EX-ZR800 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-S7 vs the EX-ZR800.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S7 and EX-ZR800 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S7 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S7 and EX-ZR800.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-S7 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S7 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S7 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S7 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2013-08-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $140 | $429 |