Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z16 and FujiFilm S200EXR, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is very comparable but the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z16 was brought out 15 months later than the S200EXR making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-Z16 grades versus the S200EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-Z16 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-Z16
| S200EXR | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-Z16 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 features outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z16 and FujiFilm S200EXR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the S200EXR.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and S200EXR is 99 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and S200EXR.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The EX-Z16 has got the smaller sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field harder. The more recent EX-Z16 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also called as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | - | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 0k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 865g (1.91 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-140 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $100 | $500 |