Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S2800HD
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
75 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix S2900HD
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z16 versus FujiFilm S2800HD, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the S2800HD (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z16 was brought out 8 months later than the S2800HD which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z16 scores against the S2800HD with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| EX-Z16 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2010 | February 2010 | Fresher by 8 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Casio EX-Z16
| S2800HD | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and FujiFilm S2800HD
| EX-Z16 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z16 offers physical dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the FujiFilm S2800HD has measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 versus FujiFilm S2800HD in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the S2800HD.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and S2800HD is 99 and 75 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and S2800HD.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the FujiFilm S2800HD to provide more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z16 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z16 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD |
| Otherwise known as | - | FinePix S2900HD |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | - | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 99% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 437 grams (0.96 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $100 | $260 |