Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
56 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 850g - 142 x 131 x 80mm
- Announced August 2002
- Replaced the Fujifilm S1 Pro
- Successor is Fujifilm S3 Pro
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S2 Pro, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Pro DSLR by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and Fujifilm S2 Pro (6MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm S2 Pro (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z16 was revealed 8 years later than the Fujifilm S2 Pro and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S2 Pro being a Large SLR camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z16 scores against the Fujifilm S2 Pro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Fujifilm S2 Pro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Fujifilm S2 Pro
| EX-Z16 | Fujifilm S2 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 | August 2002 | More recent by 100 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2 Pro over the Casio EX-Z16
| Fujifilm S2 Pro | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 1.8" | " | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
| Screen resolution | 117k | 0k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S2 Pro
| EX-Z16 | Fujifilm S2 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 offers outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Fujifilm S2 Pro has proportions of 142mm x 131mm x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") with a weight of 850 grams (1.87 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S2 Pro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the Fujifilm S2 Pro.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S2 Pro is 99 and 56 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S2 Pro.
To sum up, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z16 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-Z16 will provide more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z16 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro |
| Category | Ultracompact | Pro DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2002-08-02 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23 x 15.5mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 356.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4256 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Nikon F |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 309 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | - | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dot | 117 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 92% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 15.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/125 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 850g (1.87 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 142 x 131 x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 5, 2 or 100 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $100 | $2,000 |