Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2000HD
99 Imaging
34 Features
19 Overall
28
75 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Revealed January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z16 versus Fujifilm S2000HD, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z16 was unveiled 21 months later than the Fujifilm S2000HD making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z16 grades versus the Fujifilm S2000HD with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| EX-Z16 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Casio EX-Z16
| Fujifilm S2000HD | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S2000HD
| EX-Z16 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 provides exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Fujifilm S2000HD has dimensions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 versus Fujifilm S2000HD in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z16 against the Fujifilm S2000HD.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S2000HD is 99 and 75 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The visual below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S2000HD.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z16 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z16 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-414mm (14.8x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | - | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 426g (0.94 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $100 | $280 |