Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S4200
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S4200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Released January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S4200 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-Z16 versus Fujifilm S4200, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z16 was brought out 15 months prior to the Fujifilm S4200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z16 grades versus the Fujifilm S4200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S4200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Fujifilm FinePix S4200. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Fujifilm S4200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Fujifilm S4200
| EX-Z16 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Casio EX-Z16
| Fujifilm S4200 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | September 2010 | Fresher by 15 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S4200
| EX-Z16 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S4200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Fujifilm S4200 has dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z16 versus Fujifilm S4200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z16 and the Fujifilm S4200.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S4200 is 99 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S4200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The photograph here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and Fujifilm S4200.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Fujifilm S4200 to render more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S4200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z16 vs Fujifilm S4200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2012-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | - | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 543 grams (1.20 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $100 | $200 |