Clicky

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
19
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z16
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 848 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
  • Announced September 2010
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Overview

In this write-up, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") use totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-Z16 was unveiled 21 months later than the M320 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z16 scores vs the M320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Kodak M320

 EX-Z16 M320 
ReleasedSeptember 2010January 2009Fresher by 21 months
Manually focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z16

 M320 EX-Z16 
Display sizing2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Kodak M320

 EX-Z16 M320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 has exterior dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the M320.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and M320 is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and M320.

As you can see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z16 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Casio EX-Z16 will give you extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer EX-Z16 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Portrait photography details
Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
27
focusing manually
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
low MP (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Street photography features
Kodak M320 Street photography features
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than average (155 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Sports photography features
Kodak M320 Sports photography features
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Travel photography details
Kodak M320 Travel photography details
53
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
50
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (155g)
low MP (9 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Landscape photography info
Kodak M320 Landscape photography info
32
focusing manually
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen ( inches)
manual mode not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Vlogging details
Kodak M320 Vlogging details
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low res video (848 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
more heavy than average (155 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z16 and Kodak M320
 Casio Exilim EX-Z16Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Make Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z16 Kodak EasyShare M320
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-09-20 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing range 7cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size - 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 0 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 848x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 155 gr (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - KLIC-7001
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media - SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $100 $39