Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28


95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") use totally different sensor size.

The EX-Z16 was unveiled 21 months later than the M320 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z16 scores vs the M320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Kodak EasyShare M320. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Kodak M320
EX-Z16 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 21 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z16
M320 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Kodak M320
EX-Z16 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 has exterior dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the M320.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and M320 is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and M320.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z16 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Casio EX-Z16 will give you extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer EX-Z16 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | - | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 0 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | KLIC-7001 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $100 | $39 |