Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the M340 (10MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-Z16 was brought out 21 months after the M340 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z16 matches up vs the M340 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Kodak EasyShare M340. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Kodak M340
| EX-Z16 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Casio EX-Z16
| M340 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Kodak M340
| EX-Z16 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak M340 has sizing of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the M340.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and M340 is 99 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and M340.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-Z16 to offer you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The younger EX-Z16 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | - | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 0k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 115 grams (0.25 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $100 | $130 |
