Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M381
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M381 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-Z16 versus Kodak M381, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the M381 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z16 was unveiled 14 months after the M381 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-Z16 scores versus the M381 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M381 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Kodak EasyShare M381. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Kodak M381
| EX-Z16 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 14 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Casio EX-Z16
| M381 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Kodak M381
| EX-Z16 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 features exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak M381 has specifications of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 versus Kodak M381 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the M381.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and M381 is 99 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and M381.
Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of files although you should always factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more modern EX-Z16 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M381 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | - | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 153 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $100 | $170 |
