Clicky

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
19
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z16
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 848 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
  • Introduced September 2010
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Casio EX-Z16 versus Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the M575 (14MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-Z16 was brought out 9 months later than the M575 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z16 scores versus the M575 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Kodak M575

 EX-Z16 M575 
RevealedSeptember 2010January 2010Fresher by 9 months
Manually focus Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-Z16

 M575 EX-Z16 
Screen sizing3""Bigger screen (+3")
Screen resolution230k0kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Kodak M575

 EX-Z16 M575 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Kodak M575 has proportions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z16 versus Kodak M575 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the M575.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and M575 is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

Often, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and M575.

All in all, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Kodak M575 to offer you more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger EX-Z16 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z16
Portrait photography with Kodak M575
27
focusing manually
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z16
Street photography with Kodak M575
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
max ISO too low (1,000)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Sports photography advice
Kodak M575 Sports photography advice
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
26
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M575 as a Travel photography camera
53
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
68
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (152g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Landscape photography highlights
Kodak M575 Landscape photography highlights
32
focusing manually
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
small screen ( inches)
manual mode not possible
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Timelapse recording
40
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Vlogging information
Kodak M575 Vlogging information
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (848 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone port
28
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z16 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z16 and Kodak M575
 Casio Exilim EX-Z16Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z16 Kodak EasyShare M575
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-09-20 2010-01-05
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1000
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 -
Macro focusing distance 7cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size - 3 inches
Screen resolution 0 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 848x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 152 gr (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - KLIC-7006
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $100 $139