Casio EX-Z16 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z16 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
Casio EX-Z16 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-Z16 and Pentax WG-3 GPS, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z16 was announced 3 years before the WG-3 GPS which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z16 matches up vs the WG-3 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
EX-Z16 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Casio EX-Z16
WG-3 GPS | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | September 2010 | More modern by 34 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
EX-Z16 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 features physical measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z16 and Pentax WG-3 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the WG-3 GPS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and WG-3 GPS is 99 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and WG-3 GPS.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to offer you greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-07-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | - | 3" |
Resolution of display | 0 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 238 gr (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $100 | $350 |