Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is fairly close but the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z16 was revealed 14 months after the GR Digital III making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-Z16 grades against the GR Digital III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| EX-Z16 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 | July 2009 | More modern by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-Z16
| GR Digital III | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| EX-Z16 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the GR Digital III.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and GR Digital III is 99 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and GR Digital III.
All in all, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z16 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-Z16 will render extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-Z16 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 0k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 208g (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $100 | $399 |