Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z16 was launched 4 years before the WG-4 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-Z16 grades against the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-4
EX-Z16 | WG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-Z16
WG-4 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | September 2010 | Newer by 41 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4
EX-Z16 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 enjoys physical measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the WG-4.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and WG-4 is 99 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The picture underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and WG-4.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | - | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $100 | $330 |