Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z16 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z16 scores vs the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-Z16 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-Z16
| WG-4 GPS | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | September 2010 | Newer by 41 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-Z16 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 has got outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z16 and the WG-4 GPS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and WG-4 GPS is 99 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | - | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 235 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $100 | $210 |