Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z16 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z16 scores vs the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-Z16 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-Z16
WG-4 GPS | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | September 2010 | Newer by 41 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-Z16 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 has got outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z16 and the WG-4 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and WG-4 GPS is 99 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | - | 3" |
Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 235 grams (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $100 | $210 |