Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z16 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z16 grades against the WG-5 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-Z16 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Casio EX-Z16
WG-5 GPS | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | September 2010 | More modern by 53 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-Z16 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the WG-5 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and WG-5 GPS is 99 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The picture below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and WG-5 GPS.
All in all, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to resolve more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | - | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 0k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $100 | $500 |