Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z16 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z16 matches up vs the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z16 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-Z16
| WG-M1 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 48 months |
| Display dimensions | 1.5" |  | " | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 115k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z16 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z16 against the WG-M1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and WG-M1 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and WG-M1.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | - | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $100 | $2,000 |