Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z16 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z16 matches up vs the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z16 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-Z16
| WG-M1 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 48 months |
| Display dimensions | 1.5" |  | " | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 115k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z16 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z16 against the WG-M1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and WG-M1 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and WG-M1.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | - | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $100 | $2,000 |