Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z16 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z16 matches up vs the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-M1
EX-Z16 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-Z16
WG-M1 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | September 2010 | More recent by 48 months | |
Display dimensions | 1.5" | " | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 115k | 0k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1
EX-Z16 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z16 against the WG-M1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and WG-M1 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and WG-M1.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | - | 1.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 0k dot | 115k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $100 | $2,000 |