Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung GX-10
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Successor is Samsung GX-20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung GX-10, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is fairly close but the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z16 was released 4 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z16 scores versus the GX-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Samsung GX-10. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung GX-10
| EX-Z16 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 | September 2006 | More recent by 49 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Casio EX-Z16
| GX-10 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.5" | " | Larger display (+2.5") | |
| Display resolution | 210k | 0k | Sharper display (+210k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung GX-10
| EX-Z16 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 has outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung GX-10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the GX-10.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and GX-10 is 99 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and GX-10.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z16 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z16 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-Z16 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 0 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 793g (1.75 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $100 | $850 |