Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
89 Imaging
62 Features
68 Overall
64
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Released November 2013
- Succeeded the Samsung NX1100
- Replacement is Samsung NX3000
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z16 was unveiled 4 years before the NX2000 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z16 scores vs the NX2000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Samsung NX2000. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung NX2000
| EX-Z16 | NX2000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Casio EX-Z16
| NX2000 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 | September 2010 | More modern by 38 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3.7" | " | Larger display (+3.7") | |
| Display resolution | 1152k | 0k | Crisper display (+1152k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung NX2000
| EX-Z16 | NX2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 enjoys external dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has specifications of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z16 against the NX2000.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and NX2000 is 99 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and NX2000.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z16 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX2000 will offer you extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung NX2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung NX2000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-11-30 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | - | 3.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 228 gr (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 908 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BP1130 |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $100 | $599 |