Clicky

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
19
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 front
 
Samsung NX3000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
63
Features
62
Overall
62

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z16
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 848 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
  • Introduced September 2010
Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
  • Revealed May 2014
  • Older Model is Samsung NX2000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z16 was introduced 4 years prior to the NX3000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-Z16 matches up versus the NX3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung NX3000

 EX-Z16 NX3000 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Casio EX-Z16

 NX3000 EX-Z16 
RevealedMay 2014September 2010Fresher by 44 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution461k0kClearer display (+461k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung NX3000

 EX-Z16 NX3000 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z16 has external dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has measurements of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the NX3000.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and NX3000 is 99 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and NX3000.

To sum up, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z16 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX3000 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Portrait photography information
Samsung NX3000 Portrait photography information
27
manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
77
you can focus manually
decent MP (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focus
saves RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 as a Street photography camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Street photography camera
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
81
screen tilts
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competitors (230g)
good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Sports photography features
Samsung NX3000 Sports photography features
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
56
decent MP (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Travel photography details
Samsung NX3000 Travel photography details
53
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
68
lighter than competitors (230 grams)
decent MP (20MP)
no Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 Landscape photography advice
Samsung NX3000 Landscape photography advice
32
manual focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (")
no manual exposure
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
72
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen size is decent (3")
decent MP (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Vlogging camera
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (848 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic socket
34
features face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (230g)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
no microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung NX3000
 Casio Exilim EX-Z16Samsung NX3000
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z16 Samsung NX3000
Category Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-09-20 2014-05-26
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 35
Cross type focus points - 1
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.7 -
Macro focusing distance 7cm -
Available lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size - 3"
Resolution of screen 0k dot 461k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Max video resolution 848x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 230 gr (0.51 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 370 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - B740
Self timer - Yes (2-30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media - microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $100 $897