Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX300M
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
86 Imaging
61 Features
73 Overall
65
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Launched January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung NX300M, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z16 was unveiled 3 years prior to the NX300M which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z16 scores against the NX300M in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Samsung NX300M. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung NX300M
| EX-Z16 | NX300M |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Casio EX-Z16
| NX300M | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | September 2010 | More modern by 27 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3.3" | " | Larger display (+3.3") | |
| Display resolution | 768k | 0k | Clearer display (+768k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung NX300M
| EX-Z16 | NX300M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z16 has physical measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung NX300M has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung NX300M in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the NX300M.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and NX300M is 99 and 86 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The pic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and NX300M.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z16 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Samsung NX300M will provide more detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung NX300M | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung NX300M |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-03 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 247 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | - | 3.3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 0k dot | 768k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $100 | $699 |