Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung PL200
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung PL200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z16 was announced 3 months after the PL200 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-Z16 scores versus the PL200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Samsung PL200. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung PL200
| EX-Z16 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio EX-Z16
| PL200 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung PL200
| EX-Z16 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | July 2010 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 has exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z16 against the PL200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and PL200 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and PL200.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung PL200 to show more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung PL200 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | - | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $100 | $0 |
