Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL202
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28


94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung SL202, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-Z16 was released 20 months later than the SL202 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-Z16 grades versus the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung SL202
EX-Z16 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-Z16
SL202 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung SL202
EX-Z16 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 features exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung SL202 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the SL202.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and SL202 is 99 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching technical specs. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and SL202.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-Z16 to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher EX-Z16 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung SL202 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | - | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 0 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $100 | $140 |