Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ST50
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the TL100 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z16 was launched 21 months after the TL100 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL100 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-Z16 grades against the TL100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Samsung TL100. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung TL100
EX-Z16 | TL100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 21 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Casio EX-Z16
TL100 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 2.7" | " | Larger display (+2.7") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung TL100
EX-Z16 | TL100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 has got outer dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL100 has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the TL100.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and TL100 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and TL100.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution so you should expect similar quality of files though you need to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The younger EX-Z16 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung TL100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung TL100 |
Alternate name | - | ST50 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | - | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 219g (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $100 | $22 |