Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL500
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as EX1
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung TL500, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is fairly similar but the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") boast different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z16 was released 3 months after the TL500 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-Z16 matches up vs the TL500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung TL500
EX-Z16 | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio EX-Z16
TL500 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 0k | Sharper display (+614k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung TL500
EX-Z16 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2010 | July 2010 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z16 and the TL500.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and TL500 is 99 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and TL500.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z16 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-Z16 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung TL500 |
Also called as | - | EX1 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | - | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 0k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 386 gr (0.85 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-07A |
Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $100 | $527 |