Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB2200F
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung WB2200F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z16 was brought out 4 years earlier than the WB2200F which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z16 grades vs the WB2200F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Samsung WB2200F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung WB2200F
| EX-Z16 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-Z16
| WB2200F | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 40 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung WB2200F
| EX-Z16 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z16 has physical dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 versus Samsung WB2200F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z16 against the WB2200F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z16 and WB2200F is 99 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and WB2200F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | - | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 708 grams (1.56 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-1410 |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $100 | $599 |