Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB250F
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung WB250F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z16 was announced 3 years before the WB250F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z16 grades vs the WB250F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung WB250F
EX-Z16 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-Z16
WB250F | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | September 2010 | Newer by 28 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung WB250F
EX-Z16 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and WB250F is 99 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The picture here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB250F to provide you with greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung WB250F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | - | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 226 gr (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $100 | $250 |