Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z16 was announced 3 years prior to the WB30F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-Z16 grades against the WB30F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung WB30F
EX-Z16 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-Z16
WB30F | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | September 2010 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Display size | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung WB30F
EX-Z16 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 has exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the WB30F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and WB30F is 99 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and WB30F.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB30F to provide more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung WB30F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | - | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 0k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $100 | $180 |