Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z16 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z16 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z16 grades against the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-Z16 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-Z16
| DP2 Quattro | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-Z16 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z16 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the DP2 Quattro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and DP2 Quattro is 99 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The photograph below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and DP2 Quattro.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z16 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you extra detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | - | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 395g (0.87 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $100 | $931 |