Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z16 was launched 6 years prior to the Quattro and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z16 grades vs the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Sigma Quattro
| EX-Z16 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Casio EX-Z16
| Quattro | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 66 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+1620k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Sigma Quattro
| EX-Z16 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 has exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the Quattro.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and Quattro is 99 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and Quattro.
All in all, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z16 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro will show greater detail utilizing its extra 17MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | - | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 0k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | - |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 625g (1.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $100 | $738 |
