Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A3000
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Renewed by Sony a3500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A3000 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z16 versus Sony A3000, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and A3000 (20MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and A3000 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z16 was introduced 3 years before the A3000 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-Z16 matches up versus the A3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Sony Alpha A3000. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Sony A3000
| EX-Z16 | A3000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Casio EX-Z16
| A3000 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 | September 2010 | More modern by 35 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Sony A3000
| EX-Z16 | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z16 comes with physical measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A3000 has dimensions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z16 versus Sony A3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the A3000.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and A3000 is 99 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The pic below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and A3000.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z16 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony A3000 will result in greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony A3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sony Alpha A3000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-08-27 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 411 grams (0.91 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1068 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $100 | $398 |