Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony NEX-C3
99 Imaging
34 Features
19 Overall
28
91 Imaging
55 Features
57 Overall
55
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-3
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-F3
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Casio EX-Z16 and Sony NEX-C3, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the EX-Z16 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z16 was announced 11 months before the NEX-C3 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z16 scores vs the NEX-C3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Sony NEX-C3
| EX-Z16 | NEX-C3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Casio EX-Z16
| NEX-C3 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 | September 2010 | More recent by 11 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Clearer display (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Sony NEX-C3
| EX-Z16 | NEX-C3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 provides exterior dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has sizing of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z16 and Sony NEX-C3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the NEX-C3.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and NEX-C3 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The visual here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and NEX-C3.
All in all, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z16 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-C3 will resolve greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2011-08-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | - | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $100 | $343 |