Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z16 was announced 16 months before the TX200V which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z16 scores against the TX200V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Sony TX200V
| EX-Z16 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-Z16
| TX200V | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 16 months |
| Screen sizing | 3.3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 0k | Crisper screen (+1230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Sony TX200V
| EX-Z16 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z16 enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z16 compared to the TX200V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and TX200V is 99 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The image below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and TX200V.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony TX200V to produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z16 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | - | 3.3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $100 | $500 |