Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both of them are offered by Casio. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured about the same time to the EX-Z35 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the EX-Z35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Casio EX-Z35
| EX-Z2000 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-Z35 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Casio EX-Z35
| EX-Z2000 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | February 2010 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z35 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the EX-Z35.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and EX-Z35 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and EX-Z35.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to offer extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $99 |