Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
![Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000/Casio-EX-Z2000-front.jpg)
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both of them are offered by Casio. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z2000 was manufactured about the same time to the EX-Z35 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the EX-Z35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Casio EX-Z35
EX-Z2000 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-Z2000
EX-Z35 | EX-Z2000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Casio EX-Z35
EX-Z2000 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | Similar generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z35 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the EX-Z35.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and EX-Z35 is 95 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and EX-Z35.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to offer extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2010-02-21 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $99 |