Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm F200EXR, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z2000 was released 9 months after the Fujifilm F200EXR so they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-Z2000 matches up against the Fujifilm F200EXR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 9 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 features exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F200EXR has sizing of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm F200EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The image here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z2000 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Casio EX-Z2000 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-Z2000 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2009-04-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $350 |